Studies have shown a condom failure rate of 10-33% for preventing pregnancies... But disease can be transmitted any time of the month..And industry officials admit condoms have holes 50 to 500 times the size of the HIV virus. In fact, the government withdrew a $2.6 million grant to study condom effectiveness because of the number of condom users who could become infected in such a study.


Condom 'safe sex' theory full of holes


Adapted from an article by Diane Dew in The Covington News 3/16/95

In an attempt to curb the rise in teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, schools across the country have implemented sex education programs. The curricula these courses employ are designed to provide instruction in "safe sex" procedures to protect teens from transmission of HIV/AIDS.

     Asked whether they are concerned about contracting HIV, most teens feel they are protected through use of a condom.

     But just how safe is "safe"?

In-use failure rates
     According to an article by the Alan Guttmacher Institute, published in Planned Parenthood's Family Planning Perspectives May/June 1989, condoms have an 11.4 to 22.3 percent failure rate among teens. Studies of five brands of condoms, reported in the British Journal of Medicine July 11, 1987, showed a failure rate of 26 percent due to rupture and slippage alone. And the New England Journal of Medicine Mar. 23, 1989 showed condoms have a failure rate of 10 to 33 percent for preventing pregnancies in women 25 years and younger.

     These figures represent rates of pregnancy. However, a woman is fertile only certain times of the month; diseases can be transmitted at any time. And condoms cannot provide adequate protection, industry officials admit.

Industry admits naturally occurring defects
     Even intact condoms have naturally occurring defects (tiny holes penetrating the entire thickness) measuring five to 50 microns in diameter -- 50 to 500 times the size of the HIV virus, writes C. Michael Roland, head of the Polymer Properties Section at the Naval Research laboratory in Washington, D.C. and editor of Rubber Chemistry and Technology, in a published letter to the Washington Times. [In other words, just as rubber tires, over time, lose air, condoms (manufactured of the same product, rubber) also are porous.]

     "... the rubber comprising latex condoms has intrinsic voids about 5 microns (0.0002 inches) in size," Roland states. "Contrarily, the AIDS virus is only 0.1 micron (4 millionths of an inch) in size. Since this is a factor of 50 smaller than the voids inherent in rubber, the virus can readily pass through the condom."

     In addition, condom manufacturers allow 0.4 percent of any given batch to be defective, before a recall is ordered.

Latex glove specifications
     Studies done by Georgetown Medical University and theNational Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Md., published in Nature, Sept. 1, 1988, show that latex gloves, made to much higher specifications than the condom, have pores 50 times larger than the 0.1 micron HIV virus.

     Even if there were no pores in latex, in-use breakage and slip-off rates are "so high as to make condoms ineffective for protection against HIV," says biochemist and molecular biologist Dr. David G. Collart, Ph.D., of Stone Mountain, Ga.

    In fact, "the U.S. government has withdrawn a $2.6 million grant to study condoms because 'an unacceptably high number of condom users probably would have been infected in such a study,'" he says, citing a 1989 article published in Infection.

     However, teens say their sex education classes are not informing them of these facts. Condoms have been presented as a "safe and effective" means of avoiding both pregnancy and HIV/AIDS, they say.

Behavioral change 
   Teens' knowledge of the facts, in and of itself, however, often does not lead to behavior change anyway, according to a study by Harvard Medical School and Washington University.

     "Information alone is not a potent factor in risk change," the study showed. In the study, 436 of the youths scored "80 percent or greater on the knowledge quiz and were still engaging in at least one high-risk behavior. Yet 69 percent of them said they were at no risk, and 30 percent at low risk ..."

     "The findings reinforce the results of other studies that find no association between knowledge and risk behaviors," the study, published in Pediatrics May 1992, found.

     Sex education and contraceptive instruction aside, some teens appear to be learning their lessons the hard way.

Copyright © 1995 Diane Dew

"For they are a nation lacking in counsel & there is no understanding in them. Would that they were wise, that they understood this, that they would discern their future!" Deut 32:28 "They shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons & their daughters...& the land was polluted with blood..." Psa106:38


Who Funds Planned Parenthood
& Other Pro-Abortion Groups?

Your insurance company?
Your favorite department store?
Your breakfast cereal maker?
Your news provider?

Why should we care what they do with their money?
"Where your treasure is, there your heart will be also."
Luke 12:34

In other words, media dedicated enough to a cause to support it
financially probably also are biased toward that issue in their reporting.


||  Pro-life Perspective  ||  Bible Studies  ||  The Prayer Place ||  Poems ||
||  'Comfort Ye My People'  ||  Apologetics  ||  Chat Rooms  ||  Testimonies  ||
||  Devotional Articles  ||  Articles on Political & Social Issues  ||  Fav Links  ||
Music Links  ||  Bible Q&A  ||  Seniors' Section  ||  Kids' Site  ||  Humor ||
||  Publications  ||   Teens Site  ||  Discussion   ||   Medical Links   ||  Useful Links  || 


© Copyright 1998 Diane S. Dew
All Rights Reserved
Diane Dew  o  PO Box 340945  o  Milw WI 53234

This material is solely for personal use and is not to be posted publicly on other web pages. Diane S. Dew holds exclusive rights to publicly post these messsages on this web page. You are free to download, copy, print and distribute one copy of this material for your own personal use, so long as you do not post it on a different Internet site. You may, however, link this site to reference these messages.

This file is the sole property of Diane S. Dew. It may not be altered or edited in any way. One copy of this study may be reproduced only in its entirety for your own personal use, without charge. Permission for any other use must be obtained, in writing, from the author: Diane S. Dew, PO Box 340945, Milwaukee, WI 53234.